Question: I have just been offered a
Local Authority case worker as a key worker for my son's Single Plan. Would
IPSEA consider a caseworker to be impartial in the planning/writing of a
Single Plan ?
IPSEA’s
answer: As we have said already on key workers and direct payments, IPSEA does
not believe that key workers who are not independent of LAs will able to give robust
advice to families and young people. In our experience LA caseworkers are well
aware of their LA’s policies and criteria for statementing and resourcing
provision, but not their legal basis. The law requires, for instance, Part 3 of
the statement to be written without regard to resources or placement, but we
frequently meet statements written the other way around, driven by what’s
available rather than what the child needs, and often with a band or matrix
position the only thing specified. It’s easy to see why LA caseworkers behave
like that, especially when LA budgets are reducing, but it means parents should
try to get independent knowledgeable advice. It will be useful to do the
same checks on the single plan as on a statement, especially on its
specification of provision.
However, please
remember that even if you ensure that everything your child needs is specified, anything in a ‘single plan’ is not currently legally binding on
an LA, and where there is any possibility that this may endanger a child’s provision,
parents can opt for a statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. As soon as we have checked that it will make a helpful addition to our blog, it will be published.
IPSEA